MOSFET Selection for High-Voltage Power Applications: AOT600A70FL, AOTF13N50 vs.
In high-voltage power design, selecting a MOSFET that balances voltage withstand, current capability, and conduction loss is critical for reliability and efficiency. This is not a simple part substitution but a careful trade-off among performance, cost, and supply chain security. This article takes two representative high-voltage MOSFETs, AOT600A70FL and AOTF13N50, as benchmarks, analyzes their design focus and application scenarios, and evaluates two domestic alternative solutions, VBM17R07S and VBMB155R18. By clarifying parameter differences and performance orientations, we aim to provide a clear selection guide for your next power design.
Comparative Analysis: AOT600A70FL (N-channel) vs. VBM17R07S
Analysis of the Original Model (AOT600A70FL) Core:
This is a 700V N-channel MOSFET from AOS in a TO-220 package. Its design core is to provide robust high-voltage switching capability. The key advantages are: a high drain-source voltage (Vdss) of 700V, a continuous drain current (Id) of 8.5A, and an on-resistance (RDS(on)) of 600mΩ at 10V gate drive. It suits applications requiring high voltage blocking.
Compatibility and Differences of the Domestic Alternative (VBM17R07S):
VBsemi's VBM17R07S is a pin-to-pin compatible alternative in a TO-220 package. The main differences are in electrical parameters: VBM17R07S offers the same 700V voltage rating but a slightly lower continuous current of 7A and a slightly higher on-resistance of 750mΩ@10V.
Key Application Areas:
Original Model AOT600A70FL: Ideal for high-voltage, medium-current switching applications such as offline SMPS (Switched-Mode Power Supplies), PFC (Power Factor Correction) stages, and industrial controls requiring 700V withstand capability.
Alternative Model VBM17R07S: Suitable as a reliable alternative in 700V applications where the current requirement is within 7A, offering a cost-effective solution with good voltage robustness.
Comparative Analysis: AOTF13N50 (N-channel) vs. VBMB155R18
This comparison focuses on higher current capability within the high-voltage segment.
Analysis of the Original Model (AOTF13N50) Core:
This AOS MOSFET in a TO-220F package is designed for applications requiring a balance of high voltage (500V) and higher current. Its core advantages are: a Vdss of 500V, a continuous current of 13A, and an on-resistance of 510mΩ at 10V gate drive. The TO-220F package offers a good balance of power handling and footprint.
Compatibility and Differences of the Domestic Alternative (VBMB155R18):
VBsemi's VBMB155R18 is a direct pin-to-pin compatible alternative in a TO-220F package. It represents a "performance-enhanced" choice: it features a higher voltage rating of 550V, a significantly higher continuous current of 18A, and a substantially lower on-resistance of 260mΩ@10V.
Key Application Areas:
Original Model AOTF13N50: Well-suited for 500V systems demanding currents up to 13A, such as higher-power SMPS, motor drives, and inverters where efficiency and thermal performance are key.
Alternative Model VBMB155R18: Excellent for upgrade scenarios requiring higher current capacity (up to 18A), lower conduction losses (260mΩ), and a higher voltage margin (550V). Ideal for next-generation, higher-efficiency power supplies, motor controllers, and energy conversion systems.
Conclusion:
This analysis reveals two distinct selection paths for high-voltage applications:
1. For 700V-level applications, the original AOT600A70FL offers a solid balance of 700V withstand and 8.5A current. Its domestic alternative VBM17R07S provides a compatible, cost-effective option for designs where current needs are slightly lower (~7A).
2. For 500V-550V level, higher-current applications, the original AOTF13N50 is a reliable performer. However, the domestic alternative VBMB155R18 offers a compelling upgrade with superior parameters: higher voltage (550V), much higher current (18A), and lower on-resistance (260mΩ), enabling higher power density and efficiency.
The core conclusion is that selection hinges on precise requirement matching. In the context of supply chain diversification, domestic alternatives like VBM17R07S and VBMB155R18 not only provide viable backups but also offer opportunities for parameter enhancement, giving engineers greater flexibility in design optimization and cost control. Understanding each device's design philosophy and parameter implications is key to maximizing its value in the circuit.