MOSFET Selection for Power Switching Solutions: AONY36354, AO4828 vs. China Alternatives VBQA3303G, VBA3638
In modern power design, selecting the right dual N-channel MOSFET for half-bridge or load switching applications requires balancing performance, size, and cost. This article takes two representative MOSFETs, AONY36354 (dual N-channel in DFN) and AO4828 (dual N-channel in SOIC), as benchmarks, analyzes their design focus and application scenarios, and evaluates two domestic alternative solutions, VBQA3303G and VBA3638. By clarifying parameter differences and performance orientation, we provide a clear selection guide to help you find the most suitable power switching solution in your next design.
Comparative Analysis: AONY36354 (Dual N-Channel) vs. VBQA3303G
Analysis of the Original Model (AONY36354) Core:
This is a 30V dual N-channel MOSFET from AOS in a compact DFN-8 (5x6) package. Its design focuses on providing low conduction resistance and efficient switching in a small footprint. Key advantages include: a low on-resistance of 5.3mΩ per channel at 10V gate drive, a standard threshold voltage of 2.1V, and it integrates two N-channel devices in one package, ideal for half-bridge or synchronous rectifier configurations where space is limited.
Compatibility and Differences of the Domestic Alternative (VBQA3303G):
VBsemi's VBQA3303G is a pin-to-pin compatible alternative in the same DFN8(5x6)-C package. It offers enhanced electrical parameters: similar voltage rating (30V) but significantly lower on-resistance—3.4mΩ at 10V and 4mΩ at 4.5V—and a higher continuous current rating of 60A (per bridge or combined, depending on configuration). The threshold voltage is also slightly lower at 1.7V, which can be beneficial for lower drive voltage applications.
Key Application Areas:
Original Model AONY36354: Suitable for space-constrained 30V systems requiring dual N-channel switches with good efficiency, such as:
Synchronous buck or boost converters in compact DC-DC modules.
Motor drive circuits for small brushed DC or stepper motors.
Power management in portable devices where board area is critical.
Alternative Model VBQA3303G: Ideal for upgraded designs demanding lower conduction losses and higher current capability in the same footprint. It fits applications like:
High-current point-of-load (POL) converters.
More efficient half-bridge stages in power supplies or motor drives.
Scenarios where thermal performance needs improvement without changing layout.
Comparative Analysis: AO4828 (Dual N-Channel) vs. VBA3638
Analysis of the Original Model (AO4828) Core:
This is a 60V dual N-channel MOSFET from AOS in a standard SOIC-8 package. It uses advanced trench technology to achieve a good balance of on-resistance (56mΩ at 10V) and low gate charge. Designed for applications requiring moderate current (4.5A continuous) and higher voltage tolerance, it serves as a reliable load switch or in PWM circuits. The SOIC-8 package offers ease of assembly and good board-level reliability.
Compatibility and Differences of the Domestic Alternative (VBA3638):
VBsemi's VBA3638 is a direct pin-to-pin alternative in SOP8 package. It provides a substantial performance upgrade: same 60V voltage rating but much lower on-resistance—28mΩ at 10V and 30mΩ at 4.5V—and almost double the continuous current rating at 7A. This results in significantly reduced conduction losses and better thermal behavior in the same standard package.
Key Application Areas:
Original Model AO4828: Well-suited for 48V or lower voltage systems where standard packaging and cost are considerations, such as:
Load switches in industrial controls, telecom, or automotive subsystems.
PWM applications like fan controllers or solenoid drivers.
General-purpose power switching where moderate current and 60V rating are sufficient.
Alternative Model VBA3638: A powerful drop-in replacement for designs needing higher efficiency and current headroom. Excellent for:
Upgraded load switches or motor drives in 48V systems.
More efficient DC-DC conversion stages in communication equipment.
Applications aiming to reduce losses or increase power density without redesign.
Conclusion
This comparison reveals two clear upgrade paths with domestic alternatives:
For compact, high-current dual N-channel applications around 30V, the original AONY36354 offers a solid solution in a tiny DFN package. Its domestic alternative VBQA3303G provides a significant performance boost with lower on-resistance (3.4mΩ vs. 5.3mΩ) and higher current capability (60A), making it an excellent choice for efficiency-critical upgrades in the same footprint.
For standard package, higher-voltage dual N-channel applications at 60V, the original AO4828 is a reliable workhorse in SOIC-8. Its domestic alternative VBA3638 delivers a remarkable performance enhancement, cutting on-resistance by nearly half (28mΩ vs. 56mΩ) and increasing current rating to 7A, offering a straightforward path to lower losses and higher reliability in existing designs.
The core insight is that selection depends on precise requirement matching. In the context of supply chain diversification, these domestic alternatives not only provide solid pin-to-pin compatibility but also offer meaningful performance gains, giving engineers greater flexibility in design optimization and cost management. Understanding each device's parameter implications is key to maximizing its value in your circuit.